Acquire Principle of Financial Management Assignment Help Service Form Expertsminds Tutors At Affordable Prices!!

Home   Course  
Previous << || >> Next

Principle of Financial Management Assignment - Interpretation of Financial Statements and Risk Appraisals, College of Banking and Financial Studies, Oman

Topic - Ratio Analysis and Expected NPV

ARE YOU LOOKING FOR RELIABLE PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT HELP SERVICES? EXPERTSMINDS.COM IS RIGHT CHOICE AS YOUR STUDY PARTNER!

Task A - Financial Statement Analysis

a. A common size analysis and Index analysis for the statements of comprehensive income and statements of Financial Positions.

Common Size Analysis

Ali Abdullah (LLC)

Income Statement


2014

2015

2016

207

2018

Sales

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

Cost of goods sold

71.96%

74.40%

73.50%

74.40%

73.50%

Gross profit

28.04%

25.60%

26.50%

25.60%

26.50%

Operating expenses

19.19%

16.53%

17.08%

16.53%

17.08%

Operating profit

8.85%

9.08%

9.42%

9.08%

9.42%

Finance cost

0.62%

1.26%

1.22%

1.26%

1.22%

Profit before tax

8.24%

7.82%

8.20%

7.82%

8.20%

Tax

3.29%

3.02%

3.52%

3.02%

3.52%

Profit for the year

4.95%

4.80%

4.67%

4.80%

4.67%

The common size analysis of the income statement with last five years data starting from 2014 and ending with 2018 clearly indicates changes in the cost of goods sold which means the company is not a position to control the cost of goods sold as the different proportion of the cost of goods in the five years data. The gross profitability and the operating profitability of the company are also not a specific trend either increasing or decreasing as there is minor fluctuation in the gross profitability over the last five years. The net profitability of the company has minor fluctuation showing no specific trend in the performance (Nikolai, Bazley, & Jones, 2009). Therefore, the financial performance of the company is poor regarding net profitability without much change over the last five years.

SAVE YOUR HIGHER GRADE WITH ACQUIRING PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT HELP & QUALITY HOMEWORK WRITING SERVICES OF EXPERTSMINDS.COM!

Common Size Analysis

Ali Abdullah (LLC)

Income Statement


2014

2015

2016

207

2018

Non-Current Assets






Property, plant, and equipment

36.17%

43.01%

36.66%

43.01%

36.66%

Total Non- Current Assets

36.17%

43.01%

36.66%

43.01%

36.66%

Current Assets






Inventories

28.46%

25.37%

27.61%

25.37%

27.61%

Receivables

27.51%

27.86%

34.03%

27.86%

34.03%

Cash

7.86%

3.76%

1.70%

3.76%

1.70%

Total Current Assets

63.83%

56.99%

63.34%

56.99%

63.34%

Total Assets

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%







Equity and Liabilities






Current Liability






Payables

26.09%

28.58%

30.35%

28.58%

30.35%

Accruals

4.22%

5.01%

4.93%

5.01%

4.93%

Bank overdraft

3.50%

8.74%

8.82%

8.74%

8.82%

Total Current Liabilities

33.81%

42.33%

44.10%

42.33%

44.10%







Long term Liabilities






Long term loan

7.01%

9.71%

7.98%

9.71%

7.98%

Total long term Liabilities

7.01%

9.71%

7.98%

9.71%

7.98%

Total liabilities

40.82%

52.04%

52.08%

52.04%

52.08%







Equity






Share capital

38.54%

24.27%

21.00%

24.27%

21.00%

Retained earnings

20.64%

23.69%

26.92%

23.69%

26.92%

Total Equity

59.18%

47.96%

47.92%

47.96%

47.92%

Total Equity and Liabilities

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

DO YOU WANT TO EXCEL IN PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT? HIRE TRUSTED TUTORS FROM EXPERTSMINDS AND ACHIEVE SUCCESS!

The common size analysis of the balance sheet of the company reflects higher portion of total assets in the current assets than that of the non-current assets. It reflects the company has invested the higher fund in the current assets than the non-current assets. The portion of both the current assets and the non-current assets to the total assets has minor change over the last five years. Long term liabilities proportion is higher than the current liabilities with minor changes in the liabilities. However, there is a change in the equity portion in 2019 as this year higher portion of the equity in total assets as compared to the lower portion in rest of periods (Nikolai, Bazley, & Jones, 2009). Therefore, there is no much change in the composition of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet of the company.

b. An analysis of the organization's profitability, Liquidity, efficiency and solvency over the last 5 years. Your analysis should evaluate the strength and weaknesses of the organization's performance including graphs depicting the trend over the last 5 years.


2014

2015

2016

207

2018


Profitability







Gross profit margin

28.04%

25.60%

26.50%

25.60%

26.50%


Net Profit Margin

4.95%

4.80%

4.67%

4.80%

4.67%


Return on Capital employed

22.23%

22.85%

23.14%

22.85%

23.14%









Efficiency







Inventory holding period

86.84

85.74

99.85

85.74

99.85

Days

Settlement period for trade receivable

60.40

70.06

90.44

70.06

90.44

Days

Settlement period for trade payable

79.61

96.60

109.75

96.60

109.75

Days








Liquidity







Current Ratio

1.89

1.35

1.44

1.35

1.44

Times

Acid test ratio

1.05

0.75

0.81

0.75

0.81

Times








Solvency







Gearing ratio

0.41

0.52

0.52

0.52

0.52

Times

Interest cover

14.38

7.22

7.70

7.22

7.70

Times

EXPERTSMINDS.COM ACCEPTS INSTANT AND SHORT DEADLINES ORDER FOR PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT - ORDER TODAY FOR EXCELLENCE!

The profitability ratios reflect reasonable gross profitability with the reducing trend as the ratio is 26.50% whereas the same in 2014 is 28.04%. The net profitability ratio also reflects the overall reduction in the performance due to the ratio is 4.95% in 2014 whereas the same is 4.67% in 2018. The return on the capital employees reflects sufficient return on the investment with the improvement in the performance. Therefore, the overall profitability performance of the company is reasonable and not high over the last five years.

The managerial efficiency of the company has some improvement over the last five years especially regarding accounts payable by delaying the payments for increasing liquidity without burden of the cost. However, the company has reduced performance regarding inventory and accounts payable over the last five years (Ojugo, 2009).

The liquidity position of the company is strong as the company is highly efficient to cover its all the current liabilities with the current assets. However, the company is not capable to make immediate payment of all the current liabilities. The liquidity position of the company has a decreasing trend over the last five years (O'Regan, 2015).

The solvency risk level of the company has improved over the last five years. The company has higher debt portion against the equity portion in the total assets. The company is efficient to cover its debt service charge with earnings from the operating activities. However, the company has decreased its performance over the period (Pinson, 2008).

Therefore, the company has reduced its performance over the last five years regarding managerial efficiency performance, profitability performance, liquidity position and solvency risk.

NEVER LOSE YOUR CHANCE TO EXCEL IN PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT - HIRE BEST QUALITY TUTOR FOR ASSIGNMENT HELP!

Task B - Project Risk Analysis

Q1. Calculate Expected NPV. Calculate the Standard Deviation of NPV.

Project A

NPV ($M) (X)

Probability of Occurrence

Expected NPV

(X-µ)

(X-µ)^2

Expected value = (X-µ)^2×P

20

0.1

2

-22

484

48.4

40

0.5

20

-2

4

2

50

0.4

20

8

64

25.6

Mean (µ)


42




Variance





76

Standard Deviation





8.717798

 

Project B

NPV ($M) (X)

Probability of Occurrence

Expected NPV

(X-µ)

(X-µ)^2

Expected value = (X-µ)^2×P

30

6

180

-12

144

864

40

0.2

8

-2

4

0.8

80

0.2

16

38

1444

288.8

Mean (µ)


204




Variance





1153.6

Standard Deviation





33.96469

Q2. Appraise the management about this project with your comments.

Project B is more reliable as compared to Project A because of lower fluctuation to the expected NPV. Project A has expected NPV of $42 Million with the standard deviation of $8.72 Million whereas Project B has expected NPV of $204 Million with the standard deviation of $33.96 Million which reflect Project B has lower variability in the earning of the expected NPV (Brigham & Houston, 2012).

ORDER NEW PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT & GET 100% ORIGINAL SOLUTION AND QUALITY WRITTEN CONTENTS IN WELL FORMATS AND PROPER REFERENCING.

Get our College of Banking and Financial Studies, Oman Assignment Help services for below mentioned courses like:-

  • Principles of Business Management Assignment Help
  • Principles of Statistics & Financial Math Assignment Help
  • Intermediate Financial Management Assignment Help
  • Principles of Marketing Assignment Help
  • Money and Banking Assignment Help
  • Commercial laws of Oman Assignment Help
  • Financial Statement Analysis Assignment Help
  • International Investments Assignment Help
  • Domestic Banking Operations Assignment Help
  • Supervision and Regulations of Banks Assignment Help
  • Management of Foreign Exchange Assignment Help
  • Bank Financial Management Assignment Help
  • Strategic Human Resource Management Assignment Help
  • Management Information System Assignment Help
Tag This :- EM19753AVN0517FIN_1 Principle of Financial Management Assignment Help

get assignment Quote

Assignment Samples

    DNA Extraction Assignment Help

    dna extraction assignment help - DNA Extraction from Strawberries or Kiwi Fruit - What happens to the DNA in the foods you eat

Get Academic Excellence with Best Skilled Tutor! Order Assignment Now! Submit Assignment