Order new Evaluation of Peer-Reviewed Journal on Ethics Assignment and Solution at nominal price!

Home   Course   Evaluation of Peer-Reviewed Journal on Ethics Assignment Help
Previous << || >> Next

Evaluation of Peer-Reviewed Journal on Ethics Assignment Help

Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.

What are others are both author's saying the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information.

Never be caught in plagiarism, Avail Evaluation of Peer-Reviewed Journal on Ethics  assignment help service  of Expertsminds.com and save higher marks!

Article 1

The article that has been presented by Reijers, et al. (2018) has focused towards providing a systematic literature review, along with an analysis and discussion on the methods that are employed for practicing ethics, in the area of research and innovation. The authors have explored the ethical considerations regarding the implications of research and innovations and the impact of technological innovations in its use within the context of society. It has been elucidated by Reijers, et al. (2018) that the disciplinary field of research and innovation, particularly in the area of the health technologies, that have been represented in the literatures, have followed the fields of computer science and information systems research.

It has been identified that research with respect to health technologies is ethically sensitive as it deals with the technologies which focus towards assisting the vulnerable groups and patients, such as elderly and disabled people. Similar vies have also been presented by DeJean, Giacomini, Schwartz, & Miller, (2009). The information that has been presented in the article appears to be true as Reijers, et al. (2018) has explored and evaluated various other earlier studies that are in the same area as the study that Reijers, et al. (2018) have conducted.

The reasoning that have been presented by Reijers, et al. (2018) does not comprise of any kind of biasness as the evaluation and discussion presented by the authors has been developed from exploration of the various previous studies and researches that have been conducted in the area of the study that is similar to Reijers, et al. (2018). The discussion presented by Reijers, et al. (2018) have been segregated into different sub-topic that are relevant to the main topic, that is, the different practices that are employed in the research practices and thereby elucidates the authenticity and non-biasness of the study.

Similar perspectives have been observed in case of other researchers and authors as well. For instance, Van de Poel, (2013) has explained that the translation of the values into the design requirements and the same is not adequately dealt with. Furthermore, for maintaining ethics in participative researches, instead of having the method for stakeholder participation, collaborative researches are more effective, apart from reflexive and democratic discourses, as has also been mentioned by Flipse, van der Sanden, &Osseweijer, (2013).As the study that has been presented by Reijers, et al. (2018) has explored the different aspects and practices associated with ethics in the area of research, therefore, the discussion that has been presented by the authors have been appropriate with the main objective of the study.

In conclusion, it can be stated that the systematic development of the structure of the discussion and the inclusion of several studies and previous theories and researches in the same, have been a positive and appropriate approach that was undertaken by the researchers.

Moreover, due to the inclusion of various critical ideas in the discussion, the authors were able to ensure non-biasness in the discussions.

Article 2

The article that has been presented by Rhodes (2018)has focused towards providing an overview regarding the significance and effectiveness of ethics in the research practices. The author has attempted to provide a review on the study topic and has focused towards development of the discussion on the basis of exploration of various prevailing studies and theories that are relevant to the area of the study topic. It can be determined from the brief evaluation of the article that the author was focused towards exploring the necessity of ethics in research practices, and have majorly contributed towards presenting the positive aspects associated with the ethical practices in researches.

The information that has been presented by Rhodes (2018) has majorly directed towards development of discussion based on the analysis or evaluation of previous literatures and theories that are relevant to the area of the study topic. Rhodes (2018) have also explored the significance of maintaining ethics in the research studies that are associated with health care sector or encompasses of participants related to health aspects. Rhodes (2018) has discussed how ethics is a moral responsibility with respect to any research or study that is being conducted. This is a significant aspect of the article and therefore, is needed to be considered for further studies and researches that require participation of individuals and involvement of critical information.

The discussion that has been presented by Rhodes (2018) is not biased in any manner. This is because the author has explored various previous studies and theories for the development of the discussion that has been presented in the article. Moreover, Rhodes (2018) has also presented the discussion in a critical manner that allowed the author to explore both positive and negative aspects of the discussion or the area of the study topic. Although the extent of application of secondary sources of information is limited in the article presented by Rhodes (2018), however, it is comprehensive and therefore, provides the readers with a complete perspective regarding the significance of good ethical practices in research.

The views that have been presented by Rhodes (2018), are in a great extent in compliance with the ideas that were presented by Farmer, & Campos, (2004) and Kipnis, King, & Nelson, (2010). It has been determined from the discussion presented by Rhodes (2018) that ethics is vital for the studies that are conducted with respect to human subjects and similar views have also been presented by Kipnis, King, & Nelson, (2010). Therefore, it can be stated that the discussion and study that has been conducted and presented by Rhodes (2018), is significant with respect to gaining further information regarding the cruciality of ethics in any study.

In conclusion, it can be stated that the discussion that has been presented by Rhodes (2018), is vital for developing ideology associated with the significance of ethics in any research study. Moreover, the vitality of ethics with respect to human subjects have been well elucidated in the article presented by Rhodes (2018). Hence, this article is appropriate for gaining further insight regarding the importance of ethics in research.

Getting Stuck with Similar Evaluation of Peer-Reviewed Journal on Ethics Assignment? Enrol with Expertsminds’s assignment help services and Get distressed with your assignment worries!

Tag This :- MWS34MON1119ESS - Evaluation of Peer-Reviewed Journal on Ethics Assignment Help

get assignment Quote

Assignment Samples

    Cyber Security Assignment Help

    cyber security assignment help - The following assignment talks about the cybersecurity of supply chains and discusses the various risks associated with it.

    Health Promotions Assignment Help

    health promotions assignment help - From the perspective of this case study, discuss how ecological, global and social determinants of health were integrated

Get Academic Excellence with Best Skilled Tutor! Order Assignment Now! Submit Assignment