Risk Assessment Assignment Help
1. Select a discipline that you are interested in from one of; occupational hygiene, environment or engineering.
2. Discuss the role of risk assessment in achieving better outcomes for a project related to your discipline (eg., workers at a factory and use of cleaning chemicals, management of a particular species or ecosystem, or community members concerned about pollution from a factory).
3. What processes or tools would need to be incorporated into the risk assessment to ensure that risk assessment results in better decision making - for all stakeholders?
4. Who are the stakeholders at risk or who may have an interest - in summary, who are they and what their interest is.
5. Discuss how you would raise identified issues with the stakeholders to ascertain whether the risks were acceptable.
6. Detail a risk communication strategy to the identified stakeholders.
7. Wherever possible, use actual "issues" to illustrate your answers. These may be related to international events, but would need to be used in a local context.
Never be caught in plagiarism, Avail Risk Assessment Assignment Help service of Expertsminds.com and save higher marks!
Role of Risk Assessment
Community Members concerned for pollution from factory
The focus is on the problems related to the toxic air pollutants which are in the air that comes from the natural sources of the factory like the radon gas etc. They are the examples where the chemical compounds have been given off by the factory and can lead to the environment and health problems. The inhaling of the toxic air pollutants can also lead to the problem of health with inhaling the benzene fumes that are generally giving off when one pump the gas in the car with experiencing the health effects that are associated to the exposures like leukemia. There have been health risks and the risks assessment tool is based on the risk management where there are processes to estimate about the increased problems of the health and how the people are generally exposed to the different toxic substances as well. There are assessment based on the air pollutant which combines the results with health effects for the different animals and the exposures (Geissen et al. 2015). The estimation is about how the people at the different instances are able to work from the different pollutant sources. The evaluation is based on the association to emission for the toxic air pollutants with using the government that can set the regulatory standards
Here, the estimates are based on properly evaluating the risks which are related to the scientists working on evaluating the risks or the emissions for the toxic air pollutants. The use of the risks estimates is set with the government who can set the regulatory standards for reducing the people exposure for toxic air pollutants with reducing the risks related to experiencing any of the health issues.
Processes and Tools for Risks Assessment
For the environmental risks assessment, there is a need to focus on the risks assessment, life cycle assessment, benefit cost analysis with the ecosystem service valuation that can help in handling integrated assessment. It include the focus on the emerging issues with the decision-making processes. Hence, to incorporate the sustainability effectively, there is a need of EPA which tends to make use of the different variety of the tools and help in developing the set of tools which quantify the impacts and are important for the social, environmental and the economic indicators. The broadening aspects are based on the analysis which is defined through understanding the economic and social factors which needs to consider about the applications along with the traditional risks assessment. The dynamic analysis is based on the alternative options where there is a need to work cover the quantitative assessments and it impacts the greatest extent feasible (Leiblein et al., 2016). The tools also includes the risks assessment with the life cycle assessment, and the valuation is based on the environmental justice tools. The tools are based on the identification of the hazards and the dose response assessment, exposure assessment and the characterization of risks. The risks assessment tools are for working on the exposures with handling the intensity, frequency and the timing with the variety of the adverse effects that are mainly determined for the hazard identification. Here, the life cycle assessment tool is for the handling of the environmental impacts from any production, use and the disposal of product.
The life cycle assessments includes the comparison with the transportation fuels and then judging whether the biofuels are able to meet the requirements which are related to the carbon emissions. The life cycle assessments are defined through entire production business with the eventual disposal and the consistency (Drenovak et al., 2017). The larger data amount needs to work on the necessary inputs, outputs and the environmental emissions where the input and the output coefficients are ready to make use and handle the evaluation that tend to seek and focus on the monetary metrics. The climate policy choices and the ecosystem service valuation is based on understanding how the human actions might affect the emission of the greenhouse gases. With this, there is a need to understand the probable effects of the project mainly on the social, environmental and the economic level of sustainability.
Stakeholders at risk
The stakeholder engagement is considered important for the environment and some of them are the consumers, the factory employees and the factory people whose daily earning is based on the operations (Mengze et al., 2015). The EPA has been looking for the experience with the public participation activities and the legal mandates which is defined in the regulatory work. The sustainability assessments are therefore for presenting new opportunities with the advancement of the practices and the government decision making. For the sustainability process, the stakeholders who are involved in the collaborative process are the people from the federal partners, probably involving the higher degree of the collaboration which includes the federal partners, state and the local government. The levels are then mapped for the information gathering with the scope to handle the environmental and economic pillars as well.
How to identify the issues with stakeholders
The Environmental health and Safety Management includes the customers, clients, suppliers and the other regulatory agencies where the organizations need to work on the higher standards with demands related to the controlling of work-related risks. It works on the framework where the management of the activities is to anticipate and then prevent the results from the occupational injury. The features for the identical factors involves the advocacy with the quality assurance and business excellence. The proponents are defined through working on the integrating the EHS management with focusing on achieving and maintaining the compliance the laws and regulations (Furlan et al., 2018). The EHS policies and procedures are reviewed and revalidated that needs to be worked upon the planning and understanding the problems of pollution as well. There are different resources to identify the aspects and then work on the inspections, permits with the investigation of the event. The risks information is illustrated through how the individuals are affected and the common risks measures are described. For this, there is a need to focus on the health reference levels to the exposure levels which will not cause the major risks for the health effects. There are different uncertainty risks assessments where the major problem is related to the exposure that relies highly on the computer models which is based on the general assumptions that tend to prevent any of the potential risks from the margin of safety in protecting human health. The contingency planning is based on mitigating the effects with prevention, and the response procedures that will help in management of change with temporary nature (Sanz et al., 2015). The plan is about handling the performance procedures, and the corrective action which involves the communication network to management, and public. There are waste minimization factors where the use of different technology, process or the product includes the energy efficient technology that requires to work on handling the less toxic varieties. The public policies and the leadership will help the citizens to reduce the waste with the developing and supporting the user-friendly recycling and the household hazardous waste collection programs. The risk communication is defined through decision making where there are voluntary procedures for the data to varying quality and the different understanding. It includes the working with focusing on the increased understanding of the public awareness of the crisis events like the increased likelihood with handling the target audiences and the information which is done in the timely forms.
Risk Communication Strategy
The risks communication strategy includes the use of the tactics and the approaches where the public communication, social media. The social mobilization includes the community engagement with the outrage management, crisis communication, health education and the precautionary advocacy. The outrage management includes the emotional response with the affecting or the at-risk population. The crisis communication includes the response with the at-risk population with the health education and the stakeholder relation. The risks management strategies includes the integral part with the effective management of the crisis. The updating is through the periodic evaluation with the management of the series of the media communication. The international responses is based on the essential steps that helps in including the identifying the reliable sources of information with arranging the risks assessment with identifying the reliable source of information (Giannakis et al., 2016). The management of the series is based on the establishing of the delivering of information and then providing the updates for the crisis management activities.
The risk communication strategy includes the avoidance of the comparison and then reviewing or evaluating the different standards or building the awareness of benefits. The risks are controlled with the raise of the moral and ethical questions that are defined with acknowledging the uncertainty and then determining about the control with interested parties. The reviewing and the evaluation is to increase the effectiveness along with training the risks assessors or managers to make use of the risk communication.
Expertsminds.com gives accountability of your time and Money – Avail TOP results originated Risk Assessment Assignment Help services at best rates!